NFL Players Have Until August 7 To Register Concussion Claims

Hines Ward sits on the bench after suffering a concussion during the game against the New England Patriots on November 14, 2010.

August 7, 2017 should have some notation on every former National Football League player’s calendar. It is the final day for players to register for the NFL concussion settlement program in order to potentially receive benefits based on head trauma experienced during their careers in the NFL that may have or could result in brain injuries.

Current NFL players and those who retired on or after July 7, 2014 are excluded from the registration process. All other former NFL players should, at a minimum, look into whether they find it advantageous to sign up to be included in the settlement class. After August 7, it could be exceedingly difficult to collect under the terms of the settlement, which became final and effective on January 7, 2017 and is expected to cost the NFL more than $1 billion.

“The settlement is open for sixty-five years; however, if a player develops symptoms in twenty years, for instance, and doesn’t register, he can’t collect under the settlement unless he can show good cause to the court,” explains lawyer Adam Slater, who says that he has been retained by approximately two hundred former NFL players.

“My understanding is that there are approximately between 10,000 to 15,000 individuals not registered,” adds Slater. “It would be a travesty for all these guys to go unregistered and not have a chance to recover.”

A former NFL player can register by himself or register through counsel. The registration is not overly complicated; however, the neuropsychological tests used to determine the amount of compensation that a former NFL player will receive, if any, is not as simple to understand.

“There are two different paths that a player can take — (1) BAP baseline assessment testing with private doctors approved by the NFL; or (2) MAF testing with private doctors also approved by the NFL,” says Slater. “We have a system where we’re going to give our players a preliminary assessment. Based on that assessment, they’re going to the MAF program.”

There is apparently a big distinction between the two types of assessment testing programs, according to lawyer John Baldante, who concentrates his practice on brain and spinal cord injury cases.

“The big difference between the two programs is because the BAP program is funded directly by the NFL, there are certain fee restrictions imposed upon the doctors so that if you do a neuropsychological test through the BAP program, there’s a very detailed fee schedule with a maximum fee,” explains Baldante. “If you were to go to a neuropsychological under the independent MAF program, you still have to have the same qualifications as a BAP doctor, but you’re allowed to charge your customary hourly rate.”

The NFL’s assumption is that there will be many more players who opt for the BAP program, because the cost of testing is paid for by the NFL. Based on same, the NFL is requiring doctors to agree to a smaller fee schedule.

The MAF program is paid by players and the cost is largely being fronted by law firms representing those players.

“The cost of the MAF program varies based on the doctors and where they’re situated in the country,” says Baldante. “A doctor in San Francisco or New York tends to charge a higher hourly rate than a doctor in Atlanta or Tennessee for instance.”

It is common sense that if lawyers are willing to front the money on costs, they envision an outcome that yields a profit. These lawyers are not taking on former NFL player clients out of the kindness of their hearts. On occasion, the pursuit of players has become so ruthless that the details have been exposed by those who claim to have been harmed.

Mark Fainaru-Wada of ESPN reported in March that “a virtual cottage industry of opportunist lawyers . . . has cropped up.” The judge assigned to the grouping of NFL concussion cases and overseeing the settlement has been asked to punish certain attorneys for using “false and misleading” tactics in an effort to secure former NFL player clientele.

But some lawyers with real experience in extracting as much money as possible in these types of medical-related class action suits ending in settlement could be advantageous for former players who are not clear on what puts them in the best situation to recover as much money as possible.

“Part of what makes a good lawyer in these kinds of circumstances is knowledge about the medicine . . . the nuances involved in the medicine of these types of injuries, and how to protect your client best,” says Baldante. “Don’t underestimate the logistics necessary in coordinating all of this on a national scale.”

Baldante also recognizes that there are many lawyers who have been salivating since the announcement of the approximately $1 billion settlement and will go to vast lengths to secure clientele for a piece of the pie.

“We know there are some lawyers out there who are trying to give bargain basement rates to attract players,” acknowledges Baldante. “There’s a little bit of a danger to that, because for many of these players their interest will be served by undergoing expensive medical assessments and testing both with neurologists. Lawyers offering ‘cut rates’ have an economic disincentive to take care of these players and work up their injuries in the proper manner. Those players might simply be dumped into the BAP program, because it’s economically cheaper for the lawyers to do that.”

Thus, players are presented with important decisions to make in the months of June and July. First of all, do they register to become part of the class that will seek payments under the settlement? Second of all, do they choose to enroll on their own or with the assistance of an attorney who will assist in potentially providing sound advice with regard to medicals and cover many of the costs, but also take a commission on monies recovered?

“This is a unique situation in which there’s a class action settlement where players have different paths to approach discovery,” says Martin Rubenstein, another lawyer working with former NFL players in recovering under the settlement. “We will seek a fee based upon and commensurate with the work we do to get the recovery. Certain players, once they have gone through the screening, we’re going to recommend to them that they simply go through the BAP. It will be a lower fee than if we make a recommendation that they go through MAF testing, which will involve more work, time and expense.”

Rubenstein says that a number of the players who have asked him to represent them were referred by other law firms. In those cases, he has accepted the players initially at the fee rate that the players had in place with those lawyers, which range from roughly 20% to 33% of recovery. That amount could be decreased, and Rubenstein says that he would never increase the fee.

Ultimately, players have some tough decisions to make and time is of the essence.

“Make sure you register. If not for you, then for your family,” concludes Slater. “Even if you don’t think you’re impaired now, you may be in the future.”

Darren Heitner the Founder of South Florida-based HEITNER LEGAL, P.L.L.C. and Sports Agent Blog. He authored the book, How to Play the Game: What Every Sports Attorney Needs to Know.

Download PDF

$3.1 Million Settlement for Man Severely Injured by Truck Boom, Hydraulics and Cradle

Levy Baldante Finney & Rubenstein shareholders, John W. Baldante and Martin G. Rubenstein, obtained a confidential $3.1 million dollar settlement in a personal injury action on behalf of a 35-year-old married father of four who was operating his minivan with his wife-passenger when a cinder-block transporting truck’s negligently elevated boom snagged a telephone wire cable, causing a telephone pole to snap, soar through the air, and penetrate the Plaintiff’s front windshield. The wooden utility pole entered the minivan’s driver/passenger compartment, violently shattering Plaintiff’s face, causing traumatic brain injury, a fractured skull, a fractured right eye orbit, and complete loss of vision in the right eye, along with additional catastrophic injuries.  Discovery established that the operator of cinder-block hauling truck negligently failed to secure the elevated boom before traveling. In addition, the truck’s boom, hydraulics, and cradle had been inadequately maintained in the year leading up to the incident.  The settlement represented the entirety of the liability and excess insurance coverage on behalf of the defendant cinder-block hauling truck company as well as contribution from the entity who maintained the truck’s boom, hydraulics and cradle.

$1.5 Million Emergency Medical Malpractice

Plaintiff was a young man in his early 20’s who was brought to an emergency room with a fractured pelvis following a car accident. Despite evidence of frank blood while inserting a Foley catheter, the defendant physician negligently proceeded to inflate the Foley balloon causing a tear\rupture of the ureter and resulting in erectile dysfunction.

$2.5 Million Ophthalmologic Medical Malpractice Cancer Settlement

Wrongful Death case involving the failure of the defendant physician to diagnose a red reflect on an eye examination of a 2 year old child, and timely refer the child to a ophthalmologic surgical specialist. By the time this young child was eventually diagnosed, treatment for his retinoblastoma eye cancer had been delayed and proved unsuccessful. The lawsuit litigated in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas resulted in a $2.5 Million settlement.

$1,125,000 Recovery – Motor Vehicle Negligence

According to recent reports, our firm has proudly recovered $1,125,000 in a motor vehicle negligence case.

The action involved a driver who collided his vehicle with the defendant driver’s vehicle. The 82-year-old decedent driver made a left turn in front of the defendant. The elderly driver then suffered an initial non-displaced cervical fracture, which led to a hospitalization.

During the treatment, several complications took place, which led to a myocardial infarct, the development of a MSRA infection and a congestive heart failure. The patient had to then be intubated due to the development of a respiratory distress.

Several other complications were reported and made evident during the trial. Family members stated that prior to the accident, the 82-year-old was an active and a “vibrant individual” who was joyful about living life and had no major health issues.

It has been established that the patient suffered great pain and suffering as a result of the significant complications.

The wrongful death case involving the 82-year-old was settled for $1,125,000.

$12 Million Settlement in Highway Construction Case

John Baldante, Esquire of Levy Baldante settled this highway construction case which involved issues of highway traffic control and lane closures on limited access roadways. The client was setting up a lane closure on a highway for construction work to be performed when a vehicle traveling on the highway lost control and struck the client who was situated on the shoulder of the road. The client suffered severe brain injuries, as well as visual impairments.

The case involved numerous construction entities and complex issues relative to the obligations of the various construction companies that participated in the project. The identities of the parties and the precise details of the accident cannot be fully discussed because the settlement was reached pursuant to a confidentiality clause.

$5 Million Acetylene Tank Explosion Case

John Baldante, Esquire of Levy Baldante resolved a catastrophic case relating to the explosion of an acetylene tank. Although this confidential settlement requires the names of the parties to remain private, the nature of the case generally involved an acetylene tank that had been left in the rear portion of a station wagon, leaked gas into the interior of the vehicle and caused the car to explode when the owner/driver unlocked the station wagon door. The firm’s client sustained severe burn injuries and impaired vision.

$5 Million Cervical Spine Surgical Medical Malpractice Case

Attorney: John W. Baldante

Patient suffers catastrophic thromboembolic stroke secondary to cervical spine surgery.

This matter handled by John W. Baldante, Esquire involved a 45 year old woman who underwent cervical spine surgery at the recommendation of her treating orthopaedic surgeon despite the fact that she did not present with signs and/or symptoms of cervical myelopathy. During the surgery, the patient suffered a catastrophic thromboembolic event to the vertebral-basilar artery resulting in an infarct to the pontine of the brain and manifesting in a profound Locked-In Syndrome. The client’s condition left her a partial spastic quadriplegic dependant upon others to perform most aspects of her activities of daily living (ADL’s).

With offices in Philadelphia and New Jersey, Levy, Baldante, Finney & Rubenstein, P.C. has earned a national reputation in the representation of severely injured individuals, complex commercial litigation, and trial of class action cases in courts throughout the country.